Get in Touch with BBP
Pump Energy Cost Estimator
Pump Energy Cost Estimator
Estimate annual electricity consumption and cost for a mixed flow pump installation, and model the savings a right-sized BBP pump typically delivers. Benchmarked against the Revel Energy 2019 California pistachio farmer data (400 HP × 12 hr/day ≈ 1.3M kWh/year).
Your current installation
Nameplate shaft power. 400 HP ≈ 298 kW
Average across the year
Irrigation ≈ 150–250; cooling ≈ 350
CA industrial ≈ $0.20; EU ≈ $0.15; US ≈ $0.08
Fraction of nameplate drawn in normal operation
0% = on BEP, 25% = typical oversized, 40% = severely off
—
kWh / year (current installation)
Annual electricity cost (current)—
Energy draw per operating hour—
Benchmark: Revel 2019 pistachio (400 HP × 12 h/d)1,306,488 kWh/yr
Projected savings with a right-sized BBP pump—
Projected $ savings / year—
Simple payback on pump replacement (indicative)—
How the savings estimate works
Right-sizing to ±15% of BEP cuts the hydraulic inefficiency associated with off-BEP operation. The industry consensus range is 20–40% energy reduction when replacing an oversized or poorly-matched pump with one sized to the duty curve. We model the midpoint of your current off-BEP setting against a BBP pump tested at 80–85% BEP per ISO 9906 Grade 2B. Actual savings depend on system curve, VFD use, and duty cycle — request a site-specific analysis for a firm number.
Sources: Revel Energy “Irrigation Pumps Electricity Usage” (2019 CA pistachio farmer benchmark); ISO 9906:2012 hydraulic acceptance; ANSI/HI 20.3-2020 efficiency prediction. Estimate assumes constant-speed operation; VFDs can further reduce part-load energy by 15–30% but are not modeled here.

![Cavitation in Slurry Pumps NPSH Solids Onset [Field Guide]](https://bbpmfg.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/cavitation-in-slurry-pumps-featured-1-150x150.png)

